Square Golf launch monitor: strong value if you want usable indoor data

Is the Square Golf Unisex Indoor Launch Monitor worth buying? Yes — at £689.00, and especially because that is the all-time lowest price, it looks like a sensible buy for golfers who want indoor launch data and simulator play without jumping to the very top end. Its 4.3/5 rating from 22 reviews suggests most buyers are happy, but this is still a niche product, so the value depends on how seriously you plan to use the numbers.

First impressions

At £689.00, the Square Golf sits in a tricky but interesting spot: cheaper than many premium simulator setups, but more expensive than entry-level launch monitors. The current price is only 2% off the £699.99 RRP, yet the pricing history says this is the all-time lowest and exactly matches the average price, which makes timing straightforward. If you’ve been waiting for a deal, this is as good as the data gets.

What does it actually measure?

The listing says Square Golf captures ball speed, direction, angle, spin rate, apex and carry, which are the core numbers that matter if you want to improve rather than just hit balls into a screen. For practice, that means you can work on whether your strike is creating the right launch window and whether your carry distance is consistent. The inclusion of spin and apex is particularly useful for golfers trying to understand why shots balloon, fall short, or curve more than expected.

The product is also described as compatible with Android, and it offers driving, putting and game modes, including Closest to Pin. That matters because a launch monitor is only useful if you keep using it; game modes can make practice more repeatable and less like a chore.

How does it perform as an indoor simulator?

Square Golf is positioned as a realistic home golf simulator with 3D courses, so it is aimed at golfers who want more than raw numbers. The key question is not just whether it tracks shots, but whether it gives you enough feedback to practise properly. Based on the features provided, it appears focused on the essentials: ball speed, spin, carry and shot direction. That is the right foundation for indoor improvement, especially if your goal is to dial in wedge distances, understand launch tendencies, or make simulator sessions more structured.

However, there is a warning here: the listing does not provide the kind of technical detail serious buyers usually want, such as whether the unit is radar-based or photometric, exact accuracy tolerances, or whether it needs a specific amount of ball flight space. Because of that, it is harder to judge how it will compare for high-speed shots or very small spin changes. If your priority is tour-level fitting data, you may want more transparency before buying.

Build quality and setup

The listing says the system is designed for quick and effortless setup, which is important for a home simulator that will only get used if it is easy to deploy. That suggests Square Golf is trying to appeal to golfers who want an indoor practice solution without a complicated install. The portable description also implies it should be easier to move or store than a fixed simulator bay.

The build quality cannot be fully assessed from the data given, but the product’s 4.3-star rating from 22 reviews indicates most users are not finding it unusable or badly designed. Still, with only 22 reviews, the sample is small, so you should treat the rating as encouraging rather than definitive.

Is it good value for money?

At £689.00, Square Golf is priced above the Garmin Approach R10 at £371.74, but below the Rapsodo MLM2PRO at £649.00 by only £40.00. That makes it a mid-to-upper budget option in this comparison set. The Garmin is cheaper and has a stronger battery-life claim of up to 10 hours, while the Rapsodo is closer in price and also carries a 4.2-star rating.

Square Golf’s value depends on what you want most. If you want a portable monitor with simulator-style features and indoor practice modes, the price is defensible. If your main goal is the cheapest route into launch monitor ownership, the Garmin is far less expensive. If you want a more premium software ecosystem and are already near the £650-£700 bracket, Square Golf becomes more attractive.

How does Square Golf compare to the alternatives?

Against the Garmin Approach R10, Square Golf costs £317.26 more, so Garmin is the budget pick. Garmin’s up to 10 hours battery life is a concrete advantage for range sessions, but the Square’s listing leans harder into indoor simulator presentation and game modes.

Against the Rapsodo MLM2PRO, Square Golf is £40 more expensive at £689.00 versus £649.00, while ratings are close: 4.3/5 vs 4.2/5. That makes the decision likely to come down to app ecosystem, data depth, and how well each device fits your practice space.

Against the ExPutt EX500D Pro, Square Golf is much broader in scope because ExPutt is a putting-only simulator at £375.00. If you only want to improve putting, ExPutt is the cheaper specialist option. If you want full-swing feedback plus simulator-style play, Square Golf is the more complete product.

Final take on performance for golfers who want to improve

The best thing about Square Golf is that its feature set is aligned with meaningful practice: ball speed, direction, angle, spin rate, apex and carry are the numbers that help you understand why shots behave the way they do. The game modes also make it more likely you will actually use it regularly, which matters more than any spec sheet.

The main limitation is the lack of hard technical detail in the listing. There is no published accuracy figure, no battery-life figure, and no clear software compatibility list beyond Android mention, so buyers are taking a small leap of faith. For £689.00, that is acceptable only if you value the indoor simulator experience and can live with some uncertainty around the deeper technical side.