Putting practice or full launch data: which indoor golf tech wins?

Display

Winner: Product A

ExPutt EX500D Pro wins here because it is designed around an integrated putting-simulator experience rather than just raw shot capture. For indoor putting practice, the quality of the visual feedback and on-screen readout matters more than a traditional launch monitor display, and ExPutt is purpose-built for that job. Square Golf can provide data-rich feedback, but as an indoor launch monitor it is more about numbers and shot metrics than a dedicated putting interface. If your priority is a cleaner, more immersive putting screen with immediate practice feedback, ExPutt is the better fit.

Performance

Winner: Product B

Square Golf is the clear performance winner because a launch monitor should do more than tell you whether a putt rolled true. It is built to capture broader swing and ball-flight information, making it more useful for golfers who want to improve full-swing mechanics, club delivery, and shot consistency. That kind of data is far more valuable for club fitting and structured practice than a putting-only system. ExPutt is excellent for putting, but it cannot compete with a launch monitor when the goal is measuring a wider range of golf shots and swing tendencies.

Build quality and design

Winner: Product B

Square Golf looks like the more robust piece of kit, with a design aimed at repeated use as a launch monitor in an indoor setup. At £689, it is positioned as a more premium training device, and that usually translates into better hardware confidence, more durable construction, and a more serious practice feel. ExPutt EX500D Pro is lighter-duty by comparison because it is focused on home putting practice and portability. If you want something that feels like a long-term training investment rather than a niche practice aid, Square Golf has the edge.

Battery life

Winner: Tie

Neither product listing provides enough verified battery-life detail to call this decisively. In practical terms, ExPutt’s putting-only use case should generally be less power-hungry than a full launch monitor, so it may be easier to use for longer practice sessions without worrying about intensive sensor processing. Square Golf, however, is doing more complex measurement work, which typically demands more from its power system. Without confirmed battery specifications, this is best treated as a draw, with a slight practical lean toward ExPutt for simpler, lower-drain sessions.

Price and value for money

Winner: Product A

ExPutt EX500D Pro is the better value on price alone, coming in at £375 versus Square Golf at £689, a difference of £314. That is a major saving, especially for golfers who mainly want to improve putting, which is one of the fastest ways to lower scores. If you only need a home putting simulator, paying nearly double for a launch monitor would be unnecessary. For focused short-game improvement, ExPutt offers the stronger pound-for-pound proposition.

Game library and features

Winner: Product B

Square Golf wins because launch monitors typically offer more training value across the bag: shot data, practice modes, and compatibility with a wider range of golf improvement workflows. That matters if you care about club fitting metrics such as ball speed, launch conditions, strike consistency, and dispersion patterns. It is the more versatile tool for golfers using data-driven practice to improve every part of their game. ExPutt’s feature set is more specialised, centred on putting practice and simulator-style feedback, which is useful but narrower.

Overall user experience

Winner: Product A for putters, Product B for all-round golfers

This is where the decision becomes simple. ExPutt EX500D Pro is the better user experience if your main goal is to practise putting regularly at home with a lower upfront cost and a more focused setup. It is easier to justify for golfers who know their scoring issue is on the greens. Square Golf is the better experience if you want a serious indoor golf tool that supports broader improvement, especially if you are interested in launch data, swing changes, and fitting-style feedback. In other words, ExPutt is more targeted and accessible; Square Golf is more complete and more powerful.

Overall summary: ExPutt EX500D Pro is the better buy for most golfers whose main aim is to improve putting without overspending. Square Golf is the better choice if you want an indoor launch monitor that can support full-swing practice and deeper performance analysis. If your game needs help on the greens, buy ExPutt. If you want one indoor device to guide wider improvement across your swing, Square Golf is the stronger long-term investment.